Agency and control in and of the media
Unit 4 – Area of study 2
In this area of study we focus on learning the following dot points:
• The arguments and issues surrounding control of the media in a digital world.
• The dynamic and changing relationship between the media and its audiences. The power and agency of audiences.
• The use of media by globalised media institutions, the government and the individual.
• Regulation of the relationships between the media and its audience in Australia.
• Issues and challenges relating to regulation and control of the media.
• Ethical and legal issues in the production, distribution, consumption and reception of media products.
By the end of this area of study you should be able to Discuss, analyse and evaluate these dot points.
From the study design
The relationship between the media and audiences has never been more complex. The contemporary media
landscape poses issues and challenges for the way that academics and commentators have traditionally theorised
the nature of communication. The media has always been considered to have the capacity to influence, but now
the balance of power is shifting and arguments around who influences who have become highly contested. The
media and its audiences are now both thought to exercise agency; the capacity to act and exert power.
Today the media not only produces and distributes content to audiences, it also generates and sustains social
networks, which have, in turn, enabled new modes of production, distribution, consumption and reception based
on the sharing of commercial and user-generated content. This has contributed to business models based on data
aggregation and the harvesting and sale of personal information collected from what many individuals consider
social and personalised media engagement.
Laws and policies of the Australian Government and self-regulation by media institutions define and maintain
standards through regulatory bodies and codes of conduct, but individual interaction with other media users, as in
social networks, is not subject to these constraints. As the media increasingly crosses national borders, governments
struggle to maintain control over the laws and policies created for their jurisdictions. These issues pose challenges
for managing and regulating the use of the media by globalised media institutions, governments and the individual.
• the dynamic and changing relationship between the media and its audience
• the influence of both the media and audience
• the way media is used by globalised media institutions, governments and the individual
• the rationale for regulating the relationships between the media and its audience in Australia
• the issues and challenges relating to regulation and control of the media
• ethical and legal issues in the production, distribution, consumption and reception of media products
• media language.
• discuss the dynamic and changing relationship between the media and its audience
• discuss the extent of the influence of the media and media audience
• analyse the regulation of relationships between the media and its audience in Australia
• analyse issues and challenges relating to regulation and control of the media
• evaluate ethical and legal issues in the media
• use media language
WHAT IS AGENCY AND CONTROL?
This area of study is called ‘agency & control’ because it analyses the power and influence the media is claimed to have over audiences, and that audiences are claimed to have over the media. Our experience makes it clear that the media does not have absolute power to influence audiences. We do not do everything the media suggests. On the other hand, audiences can do and exert power over the media but, their extent of their power is not always easy to determine.
This much is known……the media needs audiences and audiences need the media. The question that media theorists have tried to answer over 100 years is how and under what circumstances do they influence each other? The job of the media student is to determine how and to what degree agency and control are successfully applied by audiences and the media.
-Nelson Media, Flack 2018
Agency & Control Definitions
Agency refers to the ability to act and make choices. When a media audience, producer or institution has agency, they feel they can use a medium or platform however they choose – to express themselves, to use the media for a specific purpose, or to communicate a message.
Control refers to the ability to exert power over somebody else’s actions or choices. When a media audience, producer or institution has control, they may be able to shape messages or direct how the media is used.
Heinemann Media Third Edition - 2018
The tension between Agency & Control
Tension between these two ideas – agency and control can be seen in many different audience relationships with the media. Many social media platforms sell the illusion of agency to an audience when in fact their use of the system is tightly controlled. In turn, some audiences enjoy subverting the systems of mediums or platforms to give themselves more agency. Media institutions are often fighting for more agency in how they interact with the different regulation systems that attempt to control them.
The media as a socialising force
These days, when we think of ourselves and the media, we think about our relationship with our friends on Facebook and Instagram or we think of ourselves as audience members choosing and engaging with a film, television program, app or site. We think of ourselves as individuals, perhaps as a gamer or as a reader of a magazine or newspaper or a listener to music or a podcast. If we think about it at all, we tend to see media as a free or paid service that benefits our lives. We rarely stop to think what it means to be one of nearly 2 billion Facebook users or one of the million of Star Wars fans across the world. We think that we have complete agency over our media experiences, but do we?
Nelson Media, Flack 2018
Edward Snowden, the idealistic young military officer who became outraged by illegal, rampant NSA surveillance techniques. He turned whistleblower by leaking classified government documents to the world press, ending up as an (accidental) asylum-seeker in Russia.
Is Snowden a hero or a traitor?
Who is to blame?
The Bobo Doll Experiment
The Bobo Doll experiment is one of the best known studies used in an attempt to explain the way the media could influence audiences. The study was conducted by a Canadian psychologist Albert Bandura in 1961 and 1963. It claimed that children who were shown violent behaviour towards an inflatable Bobo Doll (a child's toy, designed to be knocked over - pictured in the image beside) would act accordingly. It has been used to draw links between violent imagery in the media and violent behaviour in the real world. Today, this study is not quite redundant, but it certainly struggles to factor in the vast reality of modern media. In short, the modern media has long since moved.
Media Reframed - Cambridge 2018
The act of searching online is referred to with one word: Googling. There is no other company that symbolizes the transition from old to new media like Google. While not necessarily a media company as such (although its own Youtube), Goggle has the capacity to read all of your data and determine the direction of your search. Google’s success is based on the complexity of its search algorithm. When you type ‘new music’ into the Goggle search bar, it uses the data collected from your previous searches, likes and interests from pages you have visited and the data from billions of other users to predict what you are looking for before you have even fished typing. Its accuracy can both frightening and hilarious. As Goggle is the primary entry point for most media users online, its role must be considered in the whole debate of agency and control.
The users data collected by Goggle leaves that of Facebook, Youtube and Twitter in its wake. The vast majority of what is spoken and typed into Google search bar is recorded and used to your advantage in your next search and then sold to governments and institutions, who are desperate to gather the private conversations all internet users have with their keyboard.
Media Reframed - Cambridge 2018
The effects of the media on audiences – Media Influence
When it comes to determining the nature and control, it is important to avoid generalisations. There are no definitive answers to any of the questions this study poses. Before the media was met with technological change, theorists and academic thinkers would attempt to explain the relationship between media products and their impact on audiences.
Before we dive into MEDIA INFLUENCE as a study we must ask ourselves these......
1. How was the relationship between media creators and the audience once explained?
2. In a new media landscape, which elements of their work are still relevant today?
Media Reframed - Cambridge 2018
MEDIA responsible for self-esteem?
Women’s magazines and their use of underweight and Photo-shopped models have been long maligned for stirring self-esteem issues amount young women. But now, social media, with its filters and lighting and clever angles, is taking over as a primary concern among some campaigning groups and charities.
Social media sites make more than half of users feel inadequate, according to a survey of 1,500 people by disability charity Scope, and half of 18 to 34 year olds say it makes them feel unattractive.
A 2016 study by researches at Penn State University suggested that viewing other people’s selfies lowered self-esteem, because users compare themselves to photos of people looking their happiest. Research from University of Strathclyde, Ohio University of Lowa also found that women compare themselves negatively to selfies of other women.
The effects of THE BOOK
Its not just selfies that have the potential to dent self-esteem. A study of 1,000 Swedish Facebook users found that women who spent more time on Facebook reported feeling less happy and confident. The researchers concluded: “When Facebook users compare their own lives with others’ seemingly more successful careers and happy relationships, they may feel that their own lives are less successful in comparison.
But one small study hinted that viewing your own profile, not others, might offer ego boosts. Researches at Cornell University in New York put 63 students into different groups. Some sat with a mirror placed against a computer screen, for instance, while others sat in front of their own Facebook profile. Facebook had a positive effect on self-esteem compared to other activities that boost self-esteem awareness. Mirrors and photos, the researches explained, make us compare ourselves to social standards, whereas looking at our own Facebook profiles might boost self-esteem because it is easier to control how we are presented to the world.
Even if we want to avoid the site and keep our data protected, it’s not as easy as one might think. According to Roger McNamee, an early investor in Facebook, the company uses techniques found in propaganda and casino gambling to foster psychological addiction in its users – such as constant notifications and variable rewards. By keeping us hooked, Facebook is able to hold a huge amount of data on us. What is surprising, and worrying, is the derived data Facebook has – the profiles it can build of its users based on seemingly innocuous information. The author of the book Networks of Control, Wolfie Christl, noted that a patent published by Facebook works out people’s commute times by using location data from mobile apps. It then uses this and other data to segregate users into social classes.
No one can pretend Facebook is just harmless fun anymore
SOCIAL MEDIA……One conclusion
It is clear that in many areas, not enough is known yet to draw many strong conclusions. However, the evidence does point one way: social media affects people differently, depending on pre-existing conditions and personality traits.
As with food, gambling and many other temptations of the modern age, excessive use for some individuals is probably inadvisable. But at the same time, it would be wrong to say social media is a universally bad thing because clearly it brings myriad benefits to our lives.
Study of New South Wales domestic violence cases reveals spike at State of Origin time
A NEW FRIGHTENING study has revealed there’s a dangerous spike in domestic violence against women and children during the annual State of Origin series.
The study has revealed a dangerous spike in domestic violence against women and children linked to the annual series between NSW and Queensland. Experts say the “disturbing findings” released today suggest the Origin’s “particular celebration of heavy drinking, masculinity, tribalism, and the toxic level of aggressive alcohol promotion have collided to encourage drinking to excess and domestic violence”.
They say the NRL more broadly has become a “battle of toxic masculinity and beer brands” where it’s hard to know where the game ends and the violence and alcohol sponsorship begins.
New data from the New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research spanning six years from 2012 to 2017 indicates a 40.7 per cent average increase in domestic violence, and 71.8 per cent in non-domestic assaults across the state on Origin game days.
The Centre for Alcohol Policy Research at La Trobe University examined the data for recorded domestic and non-domestic assaults in NSW on Wednesday nights, from 6pm to 6am the next day for the weeks around Origin games.
Public health advocates are now calling on the NRL to acknowledge and address the issue. The data spanned 11 weeks when games are held and included Victoria as a control measure because of the low interest in rugby league in that state. Michael Livingston said the spike in cases was significant and consistent in NSW across the three-game series in each and every one of the years examined.
“In the twelve-hour window from 6pm to 6am on State of Origin game night, women and children in New South Wales are almost 40 per cent more likely to become victims of domestic violence,” Dr Livingston said.
An increase in domestic violence associated with a sporting fixture was not new — there was increase in domestic violence experienced in England during the 2010 World Cup.
Citizen Journalism is the reporting of news and events by members of the public using the internet as a means to spread information.
The concept of citizen journalism is based upon public citizens "playing an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analysing, and disseminating news and information."
SAC & EXAM QUESTION: Define and evaluate ONE major ethical implication of citizen journalism - 7 marks
Fake news is a type of yellow journalism or propaganda that consists of deliberate misinformation or hoaxes spread via traditional print and broadcast news media or online social media. This false information is mainly distributed by social media, but is periodically circulated through mainstream media. Fake news is written and published with the intent to mislead in order to damage an agency, entity, or person, and/or gain financially or politically, often using sensationalist, dishonest, or outright fabricated headlines to increase readership, online sharing, and Internet click revenue.
TWO QUESTIONS THAT COULD ARRISE ON THIS TOPIC:
1. Government agencies will often use media products to attempt to enact control over specific audiences. Describe one way a government has used the media and how effective they were. (4 marks)
2. If audience believe FAKE NEWS and therefore act on the information they have been provided what Communication Theory can this be linked too. Explain your response in detail. (4marks)
‘Snapchat Dysmorphia’ Causes People to Seek Plastic Surgery to Replicate Social Media Filters
Doctors say they’ve seen a nationwide uptick in patients seeking plastic surgery to look more like the filtered version of themselves that they’ve created using popular apps like Snapchat and Instagram.
According to researchers from Boston University School of Medicine’s Department of Dermatology, the new phenomenon, dubbed “Snapchat dysmorphia,” involves people asking plastic surgeons to reproduce the “instant fix” they see in their own smartphone-edited selfies: an airbrushed version of themselves with fuller lips, bigger eyes or a thinner nose.
Researchers called the trend “alarming” in a recent article in the peer-reviewed journal JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, noting that “filtered selfies often present an unattainable look and are blurring the line of reality and fantasy for these patients.”
The researchers categorized “Snapchat dysmorphia” as a version of body dysmorphic disorder, a mental condition that causes people to become obsessed with perceived defects in their appearance.
Neelam Vashi, a professor of dermatology at Boston University School of Medicine and a co-author of the article, told The Washington Post that the widespread availability of photo-editing software is giving some patients unrealistic expectations about what they should look like.
The researchers’ article also notes that in 2017, 55 percent of surgeons reported seeing patients who requested surgery to look better in selfies, according to a recent survey by the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
“That’s been a trend for a number of years now,” Dr. Maman says. “Obviously the more people are posting on social media, the more selfies they take, the more they’re aware of what they look like, the more concerned they are about their appearance. Just like it’s true for all these fashion bloggers and fashion Instagrammers and Snapchatters, the same is true for plastic surgery. People want to look [the best they can] and achieve the best possible results they can.”
Before the rise of social media, “if you didn’t want to share your photo with the public, you didn’t have to,” he continues.
“Now people are posting pictures of you, if you’re not doing it yourself. Overall concern for physical appearance has increased as a result of that.”
August 06, 2018 03:32 PM
Gaming addiction has become so serious the World Health Organisation has now classified it as a disease.
Experts are calling it a “modern tragedy” as overwhelmed parents fear for their lives, forced to let their children keep their devices because they get violent as soon as they attempt to remove them.
PARENTS of teens who haven’t gone to school for as long as two years because of their gaming addictions have been slammed for their efforts to stop the problem behaviour.
Logan Ford, profiled last night on 60 Minutes, is one of several teens in Australia confined to their bedrooms because of gaming addiction.
Video game addiction 'leading to irreversible brain changes in kids'
The brains of Australian children are being irrevocably shaped and changed due to extensive time spent video gaming, experts warn.
Speaking to 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown, education coach Jill Sweatman described the impact of excessive gaming as dire and long term, leading to what is called “planned brain death”.
“That occurs from the time the child is almost born. It’s already getting rid of brain cells that are not being used,” Sweatman explained.
“What worries me most is that if so much time is devoted to just entertainment, under the auspices, the control of game designers, over a long period of time, what are we really losing?
“And those brain cells can't be gotten back in later life.”
Studies have shown that 90 percent of adolescents play video games and 15 percent show signs of addiction – physiological traits that are similar to pathological gamblers.
The World Health Organisation this year recognised gaming addiction as a legitimate disease, but it is not yet a diagnosable condition in Australia - resulting in many families struggling to cope or receive suitable treatment.
Thousands of teenagers across the nation are battling everything from social anxiety, depression and violent outbursts as their addiction with the video gaming world continues to grow.
Gaming - A different perspective - 60 Minutes
An obsession with eating foods that one considers healthy.
Definition: A medical condition in which the sufferer systematically avoids specific foods that they believe to be harmful.
Orthorexia is now a recognised medical condition in Australia. This has come about in recent studies due to the increase in Social Media Usage by vulnerable people.
Incidents of depression have been linked to heavy social media use. For example, there is an increasing amount of evidence that connects the amount of time spent on Facebook with the occurrence of depression. Other studies have also suggested that the extensive use of social media by young adults has a negative impact on body image, depression, social comparison, and disordered eating. Beyond these negatives, social media sites that offer the newest superfood or latest diet fad may be just as damaging. Studies are beginning to see a correlation between disordered eating – particularly orthorexia, or an obsession with eating healthy foods that can lead to unhealthy consequences like nutrient deficiencies, social isolation and anxiety.
Although not formally recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, awareness about orthorexia is on the rise. Being concerned with the nutritional quality of the food is not a problem and is actually a good habit to develop. However, individuals with orthorexia become so fixated on what is considered healthy eating that they actually start to damage their own well-being. Studies have shown that many individuals with orthorexia also have obsessive-compulsive disorder. High orthorexia nervosa prevalence has been found in populations who take an active interest in their health and body and is frequently comorbid with anorexia nervosa. In particular, there seems to be a link between Instagram users and signs of orthorexia symptoms.
Understandably, people use social media to discover healthy eating tips or to stay accountable to a fitness plan. But the pursuit of nutritious eating can become an unhealthy preoccupation. The pursuit of the perfect diet can lead to self-punishment and interfere with social activities. Eating disorders and disordered eating behaviours do not discriminate; they can affect women, men, girls and boys.
Rebuttal: Instagram and Social Media platforms are designed to share stories and lifestyles. The end user has the ability to not follow or close their account.
Links to the communication theory: The Ideasvirus. The Green Movement lifestyle and healthy eating Influencers or Wellness Worriers and they like to call themselves have created a movement and Influencing the masses to follow and like their choices. This however, is making people sick according to 60 minutes.
The Fyre Festival….That never happened
This documentary demonstrates the power of social media and its ability to influence thousands of people and have them call to action.
The Great Hack
Why Instagram has really killed likes
The Sydney Morning Hearld – July 22, 2019. By Cara Waters
Instagram’s move to stop displaying “likes” on posts on the social media platform in Australia has been welcomed by entrepreneur Sarah Holloway.
“It is a great way to democratise the landscape, there are some accounts with crazy numbers that are disheartening for other users,” she says. “It’s hard to keep everyone engaged and excited with the platform if they feel crap about it all the time.”
Instagram describes the change as a “test” and is emphasising the impact on users’ wellbeing, with Instagram previously ranking as the worst social media platform for users mental health.
Mia Garlick, director of policy for Facebook in Australia and New Zealand, says limiting likes so users can only see their own likes is to ensure Instagram is a place where people feel comfortable expressing themselves.
“We hope this test will remove the pressure of how many likes a post will receive, so you can focus on sharing the things you love,” she says. “We are now rolling the test out to Australia so we can learn more about how this can benefit people’s experiences on Instagram, and whether this change can help people focus less on likes and more on telling their story.”
“We are rethinking the whole experience of Instagram to address issues around wellbeing and to ensure the Instagram community has a positive experience on our platform,” she says.
Barnet says likes are still visible for advertisers and businesses, so the “like economy” becomes a premium product for businesses. Garlick says unlike standard users, businesses will have clear visibility of likes on Instagram.
Why removing LIKES from Instagram is a win for everybody
SBS – Published 18 July, 2019
According to research by the UK’s Royal Society for Public Health, Instagram is the most damaging social media platform for mental health in users aged 14-24. As reported by TIME, the 2017 #StatusOfMind study found that the popular photo-sharing app was commonly associated with growing levels of anxiety, depression, bullying and a “fear of missing out.”
“Seeing friends constantly on holiday or enjoying nights out can make young people feel like they are missing out while others enjoy life,” the report stated. “These feelings can promote a ‘compare and despair’ attitude.”
Copyright Time Research:
Instagram is the worst social media network for mental health and wellbeing, according to a recent survey of almost 1,500 teens and young adults. While the photo-based platform got points for self-expression and self-identity, it was also associated with high levels of anxiety, depression, bullying and FOMO, or the “fear of missing out.”
Out of five social networks included in the survey, YouTube received the highest marks for health and wellbeing and was the only site that received a net positive score by respondents. Twitter came in second, followed by Facebook and then Snapchat—with Instagram bringing up the rear.
The #StatusOfMind survey, published by the United Kingdom’s Royal Society for Public Health, included input from 1,479 young people (ages 14 to 24) from across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. From February through May of this year, people answered questions about how different social media platforms impacted 14 different issues related to their mental or physical health.
There were certainly some benefits associated with social networking. All of the sites received positive scores for self-identity, self-expression, community building and emotional support, for example. YouTube also got high marks for bringing awareness of other people’s health experiences, for providing access to trustworthy health information and for decreasing respondents’ levels of depression, anxiety, and lonliness.
REALITY verses FAKE….and why it’s SO addictive
Reality television is a huge part of our television viewing culture. It may be clear to many adults that not all is “real” in the world of reality TV. However, how do children and adolescents understand the world of reality TV? What could reality TV be teaching adolescent girls, in particular, about what is valued in the real world? And, how does it affect their attitudes, beliefs, self-image and behaviour?
Keeping Up with the Kardashians features the life of a family that spends a great deal of time and money on appearance, with a consequent rise in fame and popularity of its girls and women. Their Instagram pages, often followed by young fans of the show, are full of “selfies,” bikini and modelling photos. Photos that feature their “ordinary” everyday lives are highly sexualised, including the pages of the youngest teenage members of the family. This practice perpetuates the notion that “real” people gain popularity and happiness by focusing on their appearance—and to be successful, personal image, even at a very young age, should be laced with sexuality.
Reality TV typically reveals inappropriate behaviour within peer groups, often promoting interpersonal drama, aggression and bullying. For example, women in The Real Housewives franchise gossip, back-stab and behave aggressively, condescending and catty toward one another. The expression of relational aggression between females seen across several reality shows gives girls the idea that gossiping is a normal part of a female relationship, that it’s in girls’ natures to be divisive and competitive with one another, and that being mean earns respect and is often necessary to get what you want.
While reality TV seems to place emphasis on sex appeal, materialism, hard-partying and relational aggression, it does not emphasise the fact that many women on these shows are highly intelligent and successful in their real lives.